Discussion:
[Rabbit-dev] jsmin, YUI
Rick Leir
2010-03-01 18:27:53 UTC
Permalink
Did you have thoughts on Packer, JSMin, Dojo, and YUI Compressor?
It looks like it could be worth exploring.
Hi Robo,
There is a comparison (maybe not very scientific) at:
http://www.askapache.com/tools/online-compression-tool-compares-packer-jsmin-dojo-and-yui-compressor.html

Use of javascript is increasing, and it takes up a 'large proportion'
(hand waving here) of browsing comms. I will look around for stats, and
try some benchmarking.

Another consideration is that we need to trust the YUI or JSMIN not to
corrupt the javascript. Normally these tools are used at design time vs
on the fly, and normally someone would do some testing before releasing
the minified javascript.
Thanks,
Rick
robo
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Rabbit-dev mailing list
Rabbit-dev at khelekore.org
http://khelekore.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbit-dev
End of Rabbit-dev Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1
****************************************
Samat K Jain
2010-03-01 21:57:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick Leir
http://www.askapache.com/tools/online-compression-tool-compares-packer-
jsmi
Post by Rick Leir
n-dojo-and-yui-compressor.html
Use of javascript is increasing, and it takes up a 'large proportion'
(hand waving here) of browsing comms. I will look around for stats, and
try some benchmarking.
Another consideration is that we need to trust the YUI or JSMIN not to
corrupt the javascript. Normally these tools are used at design time vs
on the fly, and normally someone would do some testing before releasing
the minified javascript.
This feature may make a lot of sense for RabbIT installations that serve many
end users.

But for everyone else (i.e. one or two users using a RabbIT instance, which I
think is a majority of users), I'm not so sure... JS/CSS minification is
several orders slower than just gzip'ing the files in question (a minifier
needs to parse JS/CSS syntax--gzip doesn't). The minification process is only
worth the time if the same files are requested several times, i.e. it makes
sense for webmasters of large websites or proxies with many users.
--
Samat K Jain <http://samat.org/> | GPG: 0x4A456FBA

Nietzsche was stupid and abnormal.
-- Leo Tolstoy (171)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://khelekore.org/pipermail/rabbit-dev/attachments/20100301/e19aae4e/attachment.pgp>
Rick Leir
2010-03-01 18:27:53 UTC
Permalink
Did you have thoughts on Packer, JSMin, Dojo, and YUI Compressor?
It looks like it could be worth exploring.
Hi Robo,
There is a comparison (maybe not very scientific) at:
http://www.askapache.com/tools/online-compression-tool-compares-packer-jsmin-dojo-and-yui-compressor.html

Use of javascript is increasing, and it takes up a 'large proportion'
(hand waving here) of browsing comms. I will look around for stats, and
try some benchmarking.

Another consideration is that we need to trust the YUI or JSMIN not to
corrupt the javascript. Normally these tools are used at design time vs
on the fly, and normally someone would do some testing before releasing
the minified javascript.
Thanks,
Rick
robo
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Rabbit-dev mailing list
Rabbit-dev at khelekore.org
http://khelekore.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbit-dev
End of Rabbit-dev Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1
****************************************
Samat K Jain
2010-03-01 21:57:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick Leir
http://www.askapache.com/tools/online-compression-tool-compares-packer-
jsmi
Post by Rick Leir
n-dojo-and-yui-compressor.html
Use of javascript is increasing, and it takes up a 'large proportion'
(hand waving here) of browsing comms. I will look around for stats, and
try some benchmarking.
Another consideration is that we need to trust the YUI or JSMIN not to
corrupt the javascript. Normally these tools are used at design time vs
on the fly, and normally someone would do some testing before releasing
the minified javascript.
This feature may make a lot of sense for RabbIT installations that serve many
end users.

But for everyone else (i.e. one or two users using a RabbIT instance, which I
think is a majority of users), I'm not so sure... JS/CSS minification is
several orders slower than just gzip'ing the files in question (a minifier
needs to parse JS/CSS syntax--gzip doesn't). The minification process is only
worth the time if the same files are requested several times, i.e. it makes
sense for webmasters of large websites or proxies with many users.
--
Samat K Jain <http://samat.org/> | GPG: 0x4A456FBA

Nietzsche was stupid and abnormal.
-- Leo Tolstoy (171)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://khelekore.org/pipermail/rabbit-dev/attachments/20100301/e19aae4e/attachment-0002.pgp>
Rick Leir
2010-03-01 18:27:53 UTC
Permalink
Did you have thoughts on Packer, JSMin, Dojo, and YUI Compressor?
It looks like it could be worth exploring.
Hi Robo,
There is a comparison (maybe not very scientific) at:
http://www.askapache.com/tools/online-compression-tool-compares-packer-jsmin-dojo-and-yui-compressor.html

Use of javascript is increasing, and it takes up a 'large proportion'
(hand waving here) of browsing comms. I will look around for stats, and
try some benchmarking.

Another consideration is that we need to trust the YUI or JSMIN not to
corrupt the javascript. Normally these tools are used at design time vs
on the fly, and normally someone would do some testing before releasing
the minified javascript.
Thanks,
Rick
robo
------------------------------
_______________________________________________
Rabbit-dev mailing list
Rabbit-dev at khelekore.org
http://khelekore.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/rabbit-dev
End of Rabbit-dev Digest, Vol 6, Issue 1
****************************************
Samat K Jain
2010-03-01 21:57:24 UTC
Permalink
Post by Rick Leir
http://www.askapache.com/tools/online-compression-tool-compares-packer-
jsmi
Post by Rick Leir
n-dojo-and-yui-compressor.html
Use of javascript is increasing, and it takes up a 'large proportion'
(hand waving here) of browsing comms. I will look around for stats, and
try some benchmarking.
Another consideration is that we need to trust the YUI or JSMIN not to
corrupt the javascript. Normally these tools are used at design time vs
on the fly, and normally someone would do some testing before releasing
the minified javascript.
This feature may make a lot of sense for RabbIT installations that serve many
end users.

But for everyone else (i.e. one or two users using a RabbIT instance, which I
think is a majority of users), I'm not so sure... JS/CSS minification is
several orders slower than just gzip'ing the files in question (a minifier
needs to parse JS/CSS syntax--gzip doesn't). The minification process is only
worth the time if the same files are requested several times, i.e. it makes
sense for webmasters of large websites or proxies with many users.
--
Samat K Jain <http://samat.org/> | GPG: 0x4A456FBA

Nietzsche was stupid and abnormal.
-- Leo Tolstoy (171)
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 835 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part.
URL: <http://khelekore.org/pipermail/rabbit-dev/attachments/20100301/e19aae4e/attachment-0003.pgp>
Loading...